Governance for Collective Benefit

ix
A New Public Governance Based on Co-creation - Cambridge University Press

Summary

Designing for new forms of governance for collective benefit involves creating structures that foster collaboration, decentralize power, and center community needs rather than relying on traditional top-down, centralized approaches. These frameworks draw on principles from participatory democracy, the commons, and digital technologies to build transparent, equitable, and resilient systems.

Source: Gemini AI Overview

Core principles

  • Empowerment and inclusivity: Moving away from a hierarchical “pyramid” model, new governance distributes power, ownership, and accountability to all stakeholders. This includes involving a diverse range of voices, particularly those traditionally marginalized, to embed community ownership from the start.
  • Transparency and accountability: Clear communication channels and transparent processes are essential for building trust and ensuring accountability. Blockchain and other digital tools can be used for immutable record-keeping and verifiable decision-making.
  • Adaptability and resilience: Systems should be flexible and adaptable, evolving based on the needs of the collective. This means codifying tools for emergent strategies and integrating different knowledge systems to build collective intelligence.
  • Shared resources and stewardship: Drawing on Nobel laureate Elinor Ostrom’s work on the “commons,” frameworks can be designed to manage shared resources sustainably. This includes defining clear boundaries and creating rules tailored to local conditions.
  • Holistic decision-making: Effective governance involves moving beyond simple majority voting to incorporate more nuanced, deliberative, and participatory methods. This can include citizen councils, consensus-based models, and structured feedback mechanisms. 

Key models and approaches

Collaborative Governance

This approach engages participants across public, private, and civic sectors to achieve collective goals that no single entity could accomplish alone. 
  • Purpose: Address complex public issues like climate change or sustainable development.
  • Components: A clear framework defines the group’s purpose, governing body, decision-making process, and dispute resolution methods.
  • Methodology: Uses co-design workshops, facilitated dialogue, and multi-stakeholder forums to create a shared understanding and common strategy. 

Commons-Based Governance

 

In this model, communities collectively manage shared resources, from fisheries to digital platforms, through self-developed rules and enforcement mechanisms. 
  • Purpose: Prevent resource depletion and ensure equitable distribution of benefits.
  • Key design principles (based on Ostrom’s work):
    • Boundary clarity: Clearly define the resource and who can use it.
    • Proportionality: Align rules with local ecological conditions and users’ needs.
    • Collective choice: Allow users to participate in modifying the rules.
    • Monitoring and graduated sanctions: Create systems for monitoring compliance with consequences for rule-breakers.
    • Conflict resolution: Provide accessible, low-cost mechanisms for resolving disputes.
    • Nested enterprises: Organize governance across multiple nested layers, from local to international. 

 

Digital Governance for Collective Benefit

This approach leverages digital technology to create decentralized, transparent, and more efficient governance structures. 
  • Blockchain for digital commons: Technology can be used for transparent and immutable record-keeping, enabling decentralized decision-making, automated resource allocation via smart contracts, and new incentive models.
  • Multi-stakeholder game theory: Models can analyze and optimize the strategic choices of different parties—such as governments, collective organizations, and individual citizens—to ensure that incentives align with collective benefit, especially in rural or digitally-enabled contexts.
  • Data governance for democratization: Modern data governance ensures data quality, security, and transparency, enabling better, more democratic decision-making. 

A blueprint

For a practical design process, consider these steps: 
  1. Define purpose and scope: Clearly state the collective benefit the governance will serve. What problem are you solving? What resources are being managed?
  2. Map the ecosystem: Identify all relevant stakeholders, including those most affected but traditionally excluded. Visualize existing power structures to identify potential for decentralization.
  3. Co-design principles and rules: Facilitate inclusive workshops where stakeholders define the guiding principles, rules, and boundaries of the system.
  4. Prototype and test decision-making mechanisms: Experiment with different methods, like deliberative forums, consensus circles, or online voting. This allows for learning and adaptation.
  5. Design for transparency and feedback: Create accessible platforms for information sharing and provide multiple channels for feedback. This fosters a sense of ownership and trust.
  6. Implement monitoring and accountability: Establish clear roles and responsibilities. Define metrics for success and create a process for regular review and iteration.
  7. Address power dynamics: Pay explicit attention to balancing power, for example, by designing equitable salary structures or using lottery-based selection (sortition) for decision-making bodies to counteract elite capture. 

Discuss

OnAir membership is required. The lead Moderator for the discussions is onAir Curators. We encourage civil, honest, and safe discourse. For more information on commenting and giving feedback, see our Comment Guidelines.

This is an open discussion on the contents of this post.

Home Forums Open Discussion

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Skip to toolbar