Summary

About

Bilbiography

summaries and links here

Core principles

• Embrace complexity and emergence: Future governance is less about rigid, central control and more about managing a dynamic “meshwork” of influences. Designing for new forms of governance means allowing coherent and effective outcomes to emerge from complex, distributed interactions rather than forcing a top-down solution.
• Prioritize collective intelligence: The goal of new governance systems is to boost collective intelligence, not merely to expand democracy through more voting. This often involves creating platforms for deeper, multi-perspective deliberation through structured processes, like citizen councils or deliberative polls.
• Design for resilience and long-term thinking: Effective new governance designs resist short-term pressures by building in “reboot functions” that allow for periodic re-evaluation of goals and values. This helps prevent systems from being co-opted by immediate trends and ensures they can adapt to long-term transformations.
• Enable co-creation: New public governance models move beyond collecting feedback from citizens to bringing a variety of stakeholders—including politicians, public managers, and civil society—together to co-create solutions.
• Leverage technology responsibly: Emerging governance designs harness technology, such as digital platforms and data analytics, to facilitate remote participation, automate processes, and enhance transparency. A key challenge is mitigating the risks of bias, lack of transparency, and the amplification of existing inequalities. 

Embrace complexity and emergence

Future governance is less about rigid, central control and more about managing a dynamic “meshwork” of influences. Designing for new forms of governance means allowing coherent and effective outcomes to emerge from complex, distributed interactions rather than forcing a top-down solution.

Prioritize collective intelligence

The goal of new governance systems is to boost collective intelligence, not merely to expand democracy through more voting. This often involves creating platforms for deeper, multi-perspective deliberation through structured processes, like citizen councils or deliberative polls.

Design for resilience and long-term thinking

Leverage technology responsibly: Emerging governance designs harness technology, such as digital platforms and data analytics, to facilitate remote participation, automate processes, and enhance transparency. A key challenge is mitigating the risks of bias, lack of transparency, and the amplification of existing inequalities.

Key models and approaches

Decentralized Governance

This model distributes decision-making authority across a network rather than concentrating it in a central body.

• Mechanism: Often uses blockchain and smart contracts, which automate agreements and create a secure, transparent, and immutable record of decisions.
• Key entity: Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) are entities governed by code, where token holders can vote on proposals.
• Example: Decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms, which operate without traditional financial intermediaries, use this model. 

Algorithmic Governance

This approach uses data-driven algorithms to automate decision-making, enforce regulations, and provide public services.

• Benefits: Potential for increased efficiency, cost savings, and consistency in applying rules.
• Concerns: Significant risks regarding fairness, bias embedded in data, accountability, and the opacity of how decisions are made.
• Real-world challenge: Algorithmic systems used to detect welfare fraud have faced legal challenges for violating human rights due to their potential for bias.

Participatory Governance

This model emphasizes engaging citizens and stakeholders in public decision-making beyond just voting.

• Methodology: Uses deliberative practices like public hearings, citizen juries, and participatory budgeting to encourage direct engagement and shared responsibility.
• Impact: Promotes greater transparency, accountability, and empowerment, particularly for marginalized groups.
• Example: The participatory budgeting process in Porto Alegre, Brazil, involves citizens directly in determining parts of the local budget. 

Co-governance

This model explicitly builds collaboration between the government and community organizations, giving them shared authority and responsibilities.

• Approach: Members of community or labor organizations are given formal roles in agenda-setting, decision-making, and enforcement.
• Goal: To solve societal problems by empowering member-led groups and addressing needs that traditional processes might overlook.
• Implementation: Could involve community residents assessing and budgeting for local needs or worker groups monitoring labor law compliance. 

Challenges in designing new governance

• Managing trade-offs: Designers must balance competing values like efficiency versus flexibility, centralization versus decentralization, and innovation versus oversight.
• Ensuring accountability: In distributed systems, assigning responsibility for negative outcomes, particularly for environmental or social harms, can be exceptionally difficult.
• Addressing digital divides: Reliance on technology can exclude those without adequate access, limiting participation and potentially leading to a “tyranny of the majority” among digitally-enabled participants.
• Regulatory uncertainty: Legal frameworks often lag behind technological developments, creating significant regulatory and operational risks for new governance models.
• Combating elite capture: Even with participatory designs, there is a risk that more powerful stakeholders will dominate the process and manipulate outcomes.